Hi Judd, On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 05:29:38PM -0400, Judd Montgomery wrote: (...) > The above or something like it sounds reasonable to implement, but I > don't currently have a need for it. I'll try to get to it and if > someone else wants to do it, or help in the meantime that would be > great.
as I said, in my opinion this is just a long-term goal, not something immediate, so don't waste you time on this. I know how it can be counter-productive to ask for more features than what the contributors may provide in a short time, I was just discussing what direction we should try to go to for the long term. > I completed my first attempt at a reasonable patch with no > authentication. Since I am new to the code and may have done > something stupid I'd like to put it out there for review and/or > comment. no problem, we'll review your patch (I can't right now but will take some time to do so). > http://www.jpilot.org/testing/haproxy/Screenshot.png > http://www.jpilot.org/testing/haproxy/haproxy-post-maint-mode-1.4.8.patch Best regards, Willy