Do you know what's the differences between having the sticky-table on
the front-end or on the back-end?
Am I right in assuming that that unused keep-alive connections would be
counted on the front-end only and in-use connections if the sticky-table
is on the back-end (option http-server-close)?
Martin
On 15.03.2011 23:44, Cory Forsyth wrote:
Interesting...
I was able to get it to work using a stick-table on the front-end, as
bartavelle mentioned from this URL:
http://tehlose.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/fun-stuff-with-latest-haproxy-version/
I don't know enough C to dig into the code to check on that, though.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Cyril Bonté <cyril.bo...@free.fr
<mailto:cyril.bo...@free.fr>> wrote:
Hi Willy and Cory,
Le mardi 15 mars 2011 22:17:50, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> > Whether I use "src_conn_cur" or sc1_conn_cur, with or without
the table
> > argument, this does not work. No matter how many concurrent
connections
> > per ip in the stick table, they never get denied.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
> At first glance, I cannot spot anything wrong.
I think there's a bug in the function acl_fetch_src_conn_cur() :
its code contains return acl_fetch_conn_cnt(...)
where it probably should be return acl_fetch_conn_cur(...)
Sorry, I can't test it tonight but maybe this can help you.
--
Cyril Bonté
