On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Rankov <daniel.ran...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeap, I'm aware of net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse and the need of TIME_WAIT state, > but still if there is a way to send a RST /either configuration or compile > parameter/ the connection will be destroyed. >
TIME_WAIT is usually not a problem if port reuse is enabled (I haven't seen an example otherwise), and you will usually have FIN_WAIT1 sockets if there is a problem with connections terminating badly. Now that I recall that the socket option to always send RST packets is called SO_NOLINGER, I noticed that there is an 'option nolinger' for both front and backends in happroxy. -jim
