Hi, You have a "port" parameter to tell on which port the health check have to be performed.
cheers 2012/4/2 Timh Bergström <timh.bergst...@quickvz.com>: > Thanks, I wonder why it doesn't work for me then, how do you solve "server > checking" when no backend or server port is configured? > > The vnc servers is created on the fly so theyre not always running. > > //T > > On Monday, April 2, 2012, Malcolm Turnbull wrote: >> >> Timh, >> >> If you don't specify the destination port on the backend servers then >> it defaults to using the port the traffic requested. >> >> >> >> 2012/4/2 Timh Bergström <timh.bergst...@quickvz.com>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm looking for an "easy" way to setup simple tcp port-forwarding with >> > haproxy alongside normal load-balancing. Thing is, the incoming ports >> > are random within 5900-6000 so I need to forward the same incoming >> > port to the backend(s). I tried doing this with a "listen" directive >> > and with "frontend"/"backend" setups but couldn't get it to work >> > properly. The haproxy server can "bind" on these ports just fine, I >> > just need to make sure that the incoming connection is forwarded to >> > the same port on the backend-servers. Has someone else done something >> > like this? >> > >> > TCP: 5972 -> haproxy-server -> TCP: 5972 backend-server >> > >> > As you may see it's for pushing VNC-connections through haproxy >> > because all other traffic is going through there as well. I'm using >> > "balance src" so I'm not that fussed about "sessions" or "state" at >> > this point. Any info or pointers are much appreciated. >> > >> > Timh Bergström >> > www.quickvz.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Malcolm Turnbull. >> >> Loadbalancer.org Ltd. >> Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 >> http://www.loadbalancer.org/ > > > > -- > Timh Bergström > www.quickvz.com > >
