On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 03:52:22PM -0500, Andres Thomas Stivalet wrote: > Given how the current farm toolset operates under the hostname assumption > we're still going to have change hostnames etc. > > We're currently evaluating if we want to patch haproxy for our needs or > track our machines some other way. > > Patching haproxy seems like the sane route. :)
Be careful, if you want to implement a resolver, you can't use the libc's since the process is supposed to be chrooted, so you'll need to implement an autonomous resolver with an IP address to be used as the DNS server. And if you do this, please make it so that the resolver can be different for different backends. Regards, Willy
