Hi Marc-Antoine, On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:50:56PM +0100, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote: > Formerly, if A was replaced by B, and then B by C before > A finished exiting, we didn't wait for B to finish so it > ended up as a zombie process. > Fix this by queuing all process we spawn for waitpid.
I'm a bit puzzled, why is it necessary to keep a queue of all spawned processes ? The system already has one, so we should simply do a wait() or waitpid(-1). Am I missing something ? Willy
