Great, we'd love to see that. And thanks for the other SSL performance trick. We might be able to make that and some SSL cache tuning work for us, as well.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:23 PM, James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2 May 2014 19:02, "Willy Tarreau" <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:59:00AM -0700, Bryan Talbot wrote: >> > It sounds like that Jeff ran out of CPU for SSL terminations and that >> > could >> > be addressed as described by Willy here >> > >> > https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg13104.html >> > >> > and allow him to stay with a single-process stick table for the actual >> > load >> > balancing. >> >> Yes that's perfectly possible. And when we have proxy proto v2 with SSL >> info, >> it'll be even better :-) >> >> Willy >> >> > > We've done quite a bit of work on this internally recently to provide SSL > multiprocess with sane load balancing. > > There's a couple of small edge cases we've got left then we were intending > to push it up for comments... > > I've literally just got home but I'll follow up in the office next week to > see how close we are. > > James
