Hi William, We (at HAProxy.com) often help customers evaluate HAProxy compared to their existing F5 configruation. In most cases, you won't have any issues reproducing your configuration. The most common thing in use in the F5 you can't reproduce with HAProxy is content caching. But Varnish can be your friend for this purpose.
I'll write some blog articles on how to migrate f5 irules into HAProxy's configuration. Baptiste On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Pär Åslund <psl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have experience with both. Running first F5 LTM pair for a couple of years > before out growing them and replacing them with "cheap" (by comparison to > new F5 units) 1U servers running Haproxy. > > Feel free to email me off-list and I'll answer any questions I can. > > .pelle > > > > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:22 PM, William Lewis <m...@wlewis.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Does anyone know of an existing comparison of features between haproxy and >> LTM by f5 ? >> Or have any experience of evaluating one against the other? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Will > >
