Hi Lukas, On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:34:37AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > >> But yesterday, when Sasha sent his email, I also made some tests : > >> > >> $ time git clone -q http://git.haproxy.org/git/haproxy.git/ > >> > >> real 4m37.767s > >> user 0m27.260s > >> sys 0m23.252s > > > > I'm not surprized, the repository had a ton of objects and had not been > > repacked in a year or so. > > I can confirm that, yesterday it needed 4m and a half minutes when cloning > from http://git.haproxy.org/git/haproxy.git/, now its 30 seconds. Also, > cloning from http://master.formilux.org/git/people/willy/haproxy.git/ > did not succeed (I aborted this morning after 464 minutes), while it > also completes in 30 seconds now (not sure about why it didn't complete).
Just checked and git.haproxy.org is actually a symlink to my home user dir above, which explains why both have shrunk. I don't know why it did not complete yesterday, maybe just a temporary network issue. > 30 seconds is also what I'm measuring from the github mirror. > That is on my slow connection there at home. > > From a better connected box (100megs) I can clone haproxy from github > in 12 seconds and from the official haproxy mirror 11.7 seconds. Anyway it's hard to go lower, there's a huge amount of work on the client side to rebuild the objects, and they need to be transferred (about 9MB of packed objects now). BTW, the amount of client-side work explains why cloning from the machine itself took longer than it took for you to clone from it (small CPU here). > So I can confirm we are at least equal to github performance now after > the repack. Great, thank you for checking. Willy
