Hi Malcom, The version tested comes from the debian package v 1.5.3-1~bpo70+1 haproxy -v HA-Proxy version 1.5.3 2014/07/25 Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
Thanks for your help, Smana 2014-08-22 18:47 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Turnbull <malc...@loadbalancer.org>: > Smana, > > I don't get that result on my system, which build are you running? > > [root@lbmaster ~]# echo "show stat" | socat > unix-connect:/var/run/haproxy.stat stdio > # > pxname,svname,qcur,qmax,scur,smax,slim,stot,bin,bout,dreq,dresp,ereq,econ,eresp,wretr,wredis,status,weight,act,bck,chkfail,chkdown,lastchg,downtime,qlimit,pid,iid,sid,throttle,lbtot,tracked,type,rate,rate_lim,rate_max,check_status,check_code,check_duration,hrsp_1xx,hrsp_2xx,hrsp_3xx,hrsp_4xx,hrsp_5xx,hrsp_other,hanafail,req_rate,req_rate_max,req_tot,cli_abrt,srv_abrt,comp_in,comp_out,comp_byp,comp_rsp,lastsess,last_chk,last_agt,qtime,ctime,rtime,ttime, > > L72,FRONTEND,,,0,0,40000,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,,OPEN,,,,,,,,,1,2,0,,,,0,0,0,0,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,,,0,0,0,0,,,,,,,, > L72,backup,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,,0,,0,0,0,0,no > check,1,0,1,,,,,,1,2,1,,0,,2,0,,0,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,0,0,,,,,-1,,,0,0,0,0, > > L72,RIP_Name,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,,0,,0,0,0,0,UP,98,1,0,1,0,6303,0,,1,2,2,,0,,2,0,,0,L4OK,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,0,0,,,,,-1,,,0,0,0,0, > > L72,BACKEND,0,0,0,0,4000,0,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,0,UP,98,1,1,,0,6303,0,,1,2,0,,0,,1,0,,0,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1,,,0,0,0,0, > > stats,FRONTEND,,,0,2,2000,7,2797,102128,0,0,0,,,,,OPEN,,,,,,,,,1,3,0,,,,0,0,0,2,,,,0,6,0,1,0,0,,0,2,7,,,0,0,0,0,,,,,,,, > > stats,BACKEND,0,0,0,0,200,0,2797,102128,0,0,,0,0,0,0,UP,0,0,0,,0,6303,0,,1,3,0,,0,,1,0,,0,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,32,,,0,0,0,2, > > > > > On 22 August 2014 14:38, Smain Kahlouch <smain...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> Maybe i misunderstood how the agent-check works. >> Actually when i have a weight other than "100%" the server switches to >> "DRAIN" state. >> >> In my current setup i just have a unique server working. >> >> echo 'show stat' | socat /var/run/haproxy/socket1 stdio | grep ^bk_global >> >> bk_global,cache1,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,,0,,0,0,0,0,UP,1,1,0,0,0,864,0,,1,1,1,,0,,2,0,,0,L4OK,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,0,0,,,,,-1,,,0,0,0,0, >> bk_global,cache2,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,,0,,0,0,0,0,DOWN,1,1,0,1,1,859,859,,1,1,2,,0,,2,0,,0,L4CON,,2998,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,0,0,,,,,-1,No >> route to host,No route to host,0,0,0,0, >> >> bk_global,BACKEND,0,0,0,0,6557,0,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,0,UP,1,1,0,,0,864,0,,1,1,0,,0,,1,0,,0,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1,,,0,0,0,0, >> >> The agent-check report "100%" >> telnet 10.104.9.81 4242 >> Trying 10.104.9.81... >> Connected to 10.104.9.81. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> 100% >> Connection closed by foreign host. >> >> When i force the value to "90%", >> >> telnet 10.104.9.81 4242 >> Trying 10.104.9.81... >> Connected to 10.104.9.81. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> 90% >> Connection closed by foreign host. >> >> The status of the first server change to "DRAIN" >> echo 'show stat' | socat /var/run/haproxy/socket1 stdio | grep ^bk_global >> >> bk_global,cache1,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,,0,,0,0,0,0,DRAIN,0,1,0,0,0,1020,0,,1,1,1,,0,,2,0,,0,L4OK,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,0,0,,,,,-1,,,0,0,0,0, >> bk_global,cache2,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,,0,,0,0,0,0,DOWN,1,1,0,1,1,1015,1015,,1,1,2,,0,,2,0,,0,L4CON,,2999,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,0,0,,,,,-1,No >> route to host,No route to host,0,0,0,0, >> >> bk_global,BACKEND,0,0,0,0,6557,0,0,0,0,0,,0,0,0,0,DOWN,0,0,0,,0,1020,1020,,1,1,0,,0,,1,0,,0,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,,,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1,,,0,0,0,0, >> >> Is this the expected behaviour ? >> >> Regards, >> Smana >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > Malcolm Turnbull. > > Loadbalancer.org Ltd. > Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540 > http://www.loadbalancer.org/ >
