Hey Baptiste, Thats funny. Thanks for the laugh. :-)
I agree about the f5 but I made my recommendation last week (Ubuntu or CentOS with Haproxy) and it was ignored. I was then asked if I knew how to work the f5. Lol Anyway thanks for the responses. Joe On Aug 27, 2014 3:07 AM, "Baptiste" <bed...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Joseph Hardeman <jwharde...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Lukas, > > > > Thank you for responding, I was told that the remote servers are sending > > keep alive request with microseconds between calls. I have not actually > > investigated this, I am going off of what my Network Engineer is telling > me > > with him running wireshark and looking at packet captures. > > > > The second and biggest issue I have is that we are using the haproxy > > embedded into the VMWare vSheild load balancer. So I don't have any > access > > to their configuration files. I actually recommended we setup a second > > haproxy to use and move them off of that appliance for load balancing. > They > > are trying to insert an F5 load balancer instead. I was just wondering > if > > anyone might have seen something like this or something. :-) > > > > Thanks for the reply and take care. > > > > Joe > > > > Hey Joe, where you going' with that F5 in your hand ??? > (Sorry, I tried to avoid, but I couldnt. quoting Jimi, RIP) > > I agree with Lukas, you're issue looks a bit weird! > microsecond keepalives don't make any sense! > > Well, look a bit on internet, there are real HAProxy appliances or > Virtual Appliances much cheaper than your F5 and much better than > vshield (at least you could configure HAProxy in it) :) > hint: http://www.haproxy.com/ > > Baptiste >
