On 11 September 2014 07:44, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:38:55PM -0700, Matt Robenolt wrote: >> Awesome, thanks. :) >> >> Is it possible to also get this applied into the 1.5 branch since this is >> low risk and doesn???t break any backwards compatibility and whatnot? > > I've just backported it as well. 1.5 was still missing Conrad Hoffman's > improved signal handling, but now both patches have been merged. > > Willy > >
Iirc, the reason why I did not use SIGHUP for the reload (which I'd have preferred too) is that haproxy itself uses SIGHUP, and if I used it in the wrapper, it became a noop for haproxy. Maybe I did something wrong and with the actual state of it it works fine now, but did you check that haproxy still handles it properly?
