On 16/05/2015 11:22 πμ, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Pavlos, > > On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 08:39:36PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: >> Please see attached. > > > Reorder description for act and bck in order to be aligned with the types > --- > doc/configuration.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt > index 85d94d9..13a879e 100644 > --- a/doc/configuration.txt > +++ b/doc/configuration.txt > @@ -14181,8 +14181,8 @@ S (Servers). > switched away from. > 17. status [LFBS]: status (UP/DOWN/NOLB/MAINT/MAINT(via)...) > 18. weight [..BS]: server weight (server), total weight (backend) > - 19. act [..BS]: server is active (server), number of active servers > (backend) > - 20. bck [..BS]: server is backup (server), number of backup servers > (backend) > + 19. act [..BS]: number of active servers (backend), server is active > (server) > + 20. bck [..BS]: number of backup servers (backend), server is backup > (server) > 21. chkfail [...S]: number of failed checks. (Only counts checks failed when > the server is up.) > 22. chkdown [..BS]: number of UP->DOWN transitions. The backend counter > counts > > I could be stupid or missing something but I don't know what it provides, > nor why the "weight" line was not switched if the purpose is to have backend > prior to server. I suspect you where hit by something unclear in the doc and > which should be clarified, but that's not obvious to me :-/ > > Could you please enlighten us ?
The order of description doesn't match the order of types for the field name. Sorry for not being clear. Weight field needs also a swap of the description, I missed it. If this patch makes sense I will re-send it with a change also for the weight field. Sorry again for the very response, Pavlos
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
