Hi John,

Your suggestion works very well, and exactly what I was looking for.
Thank you very much.

Regards,
- Krishna Kumar


On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:48 PM, John Skarbek <jskar...@rallydev.com> wrote:

> Krishna,
>
> I've recently had to deal with this as well.  Our solution involves a
> couple of aspects.  Firstly, one must configure an admin socket per
> process.  In our case we run with 20 processes, so we've got a
> configuration that looks similar to this in our global section:
>
>   stats socket /var/run/haproxy_admin1.sock mode 600 level admin process 1
>   stats socket /var/run/haproxy_admin2.sock mode 600 level admin process 2
>   stats socket /var/run/haproxy_admin3.sock mode 600 level admin process 3
>   stats socket /var/run/haproxy_admin4.sock mode 600 level admin process 4
>
> Counting all the way up to 20...
>
> After that we can do a simple one liner that disables a single server;
> using bash:
>
> for i in {1..20}; do echo 'disable server the_backend/the_server' | socat
> /var/run/haproxy_admin$i.sock stdio; done
>
> This loops through each admin socket and disables 'the_server' from
> 'the_backend'.
>
> I hope this gets you started in looking for a solution.
>
> I like your route of accomplishing this though.  With our 20 proc
> configuration we've decided to deal with the pain of 20 health checks which
> has caused us some issues, but nothing being a show stopper.
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) <
> krishna...@flipkart.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have a large set of machines running haproxy (1.5.12), and each of
>> them have hundreds of backends, many of which are the same across
>> systems. nbproc is set to 12 at present for our 48 core systems. We are
>> planning a centralized health check, and disable the same in haproxy, to
>> avoid each process on each server doing health check for the same
>> backend servers.
>>
>> Is there any way to disable a single backend from the command line, such
>> that each haproxy instance finds that this backend is disabled? Using
>> socat with the socket only makes the handling process set it's status of
>> the
>> backend as MAINT, but others don't get this information.
>>
>> Appreciate if someone can show if this can be done.
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Krishna Kumar
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
>> addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
>> system manager. This message contains confidential information and is
>> intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee
>> you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify
>> the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by
>> mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the
>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
>> or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
>> strictly prohibited. Although Flipkart has taken reasonable precautions to
>> ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
>> responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or
>> attachments
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> [image: rally-logo-68x68.jpg]
>
> John T Skarbek | jskar...@rallydev.com
>
> Infrastructure Engineer, Engineering
>
> 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 105, Raleigh, NC 27604
>
> 720.921.8126 Office
>

-- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. 
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient 
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any 
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. Although Flipkart has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments

Reply via email to