On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:50:35PM -0500, Andrew Hayworth wrote: > Ah, thanks - I hadn't thought about the case where connections were > queued up. In my tests, I had a very low queue timeout. The code you > suggested seems to do the trick. Updated patch below.
Applied, thanks. I fixed a minor indent issue, please be careful next time : if (sv->maxconn == sv->minconn) { // static maxconn - sv->maxconn = sv->minconn = v; + sv->maxconn = sv->minconn = v; } else { // dynamic maxconn - sv->maxconn = v; + sv->maxconn = v; } Thanks, willy