On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Ben Tisdall <ben.tisd...@photobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Ben Tisdall <ben.tisd...@photobox.com> wrote: > >> Sorry, I'm misinterpreting the test results, please ignore that. One >> ELB address has remained the same today so it's likely HAProxy has >> been using that and has not needed to update. > > Ok, finally observed some more ELB address changes (2, the other > may've escaped me somehow): > > Resolvers section aws > nameserver aws_0: > sent: 18528 > valid: 18527 > update: 3 > cname: 0 > cname_error: 0 > any_err: 0 > nx: 0 > timeout: 0 > refused: 0 > other: 0 > invalid: 0 > too_big: 0 > truncated: 0 > outdated: 1 > > Proxy is proxying. > > -- > Ben
Hi Ben, Thanks a lot for confirming! I managed to run it in my lab as well a couple of hours ago to confirm the problem is fixed. I sent patches to Willy, and they have been integrated a few minutes ago. You can git pull ; make clean ; make [...] Baptiste
