On 07/04/2016 06:01 μμ, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Aleks, > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:18:54PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> Hi Willy & other core devs/pms. >> >> I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet. >> >> Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans for >> HTTP/2. > > Well, the plan is to have *at least* HTTP/2 with the client and HTTP/1 with > the server. Maybe we'll find that doing H2->H2 is easy enough but given our > past experiences guessing that two sides are only slightly more difficult > than a single one, I'd prefer to remain careful. > > Regarding the timing, I'm trying hard to get something for 1.7 next fall. > But to be very honnest, 90% of my time spent on haproxy is spent chasing > bugs these days, the last 10% are spent on code review.
And this is very much appreciated by a lot of people(including my self). It increases the confidence level on the software when you know that devs are actively working on properly fixing bugs and avoid putting yet another monkey patch, so they can go back to development of new cool things. Having said, I would love to see H2 on client side and a _more_ proper connection pooling on the server side in 1.7 version. Cheers, Pavlos
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
