Hello Willy, Baptiste, sorry to revive this very old thread, but I was wondering if there is still interest in this, now that the DNS subsystem has been refactored?
I was looking at implementing SRV records and noticed that the default UDP message size of 512 has even become a build-time constant now, so the patch would need some additional work, but I'd be happy to do so if you'd still be open to merging it. As another point of interest, many of our production systems DNS responses don't fit into a UDP packet anymore, so we have to rely on TCP fallback a lot. Would such a thing have any chance of getting merged? Or would there be fundamental concerns with that approach? I mean, it could of course be made opt-in only for example... Thanks a lot, Conrad On 07/03/2016 09:05 PM, Baptiste wrote: >> It's very nice having support for EDNS0, but IMHO it shouldn't be >> enabled by default if it doesn't fallback. > > Hi Remi, > > My intention was to not enable this feature by default. > > Baptiste > -- Conrad Hoffmann Traffic Engineer SoundCloud Ltd. | Rheinsberger Str. 76/77, 10115 Berlin, Germany Managing Director: Alexander Ljung | Incorporated in England & Wales with Company No. 6343600 | Local Branch Office | AG Charlottenburg | HRB 110657B
