> Can you please provide the details of the known issue which might be related
> to this situation? I have gone through the list of all unknown issues but
> couldn't find the relevant one.
If you are referring to the list of bugs in the old version compared to more
current ones, I doubt you (or anyone else, with a reasonable amount of effort)
will find an exact match describing your issue.
It could be something that was fixed (or not) along with other changes since
that very old release.
So you should upgrade and see if the issue remains. If so, it will be a much
more reasonable starting point to figure out where the issue comes from.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Schneller
Principal Cloud Engineer
CenterDevice GmbH | Hochstraße 11
| 42697 Solingen
tel: +49 1754155711 | Deutschland
daniel.schnel...@centerdevice.de | www.centerdevice.de
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Patrick Peschlow, Dr. Lukas Pustina,
Michael Rosbach, Handelsregister-Nr.: HRB 18655,
HR-Gericht: Bonn, USt-IdNr.: DE-815299431
> On 17. Oct. 2017, at 10:41, Saurabh Patwardhan
> <saurabh.patward...@netcracker.com> wrote:
>
> Gentle Reminder.
> Can you please share your thought on the below queries?
>
> Regards,
> Saurabh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saurabh Patwardhan
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 3:15 PM
> To: 'Lukas Tribus'; haproxy@formilux.org
> Cc: Manoj Mahadik; Tatiana Parshina
> Subject: RE: Question related to gpc0_rate values in stick-table
>
> Thanks Lukas.
> Can you please provide the details of the known issue which might be related
> to this situation? I have gone through the list of all unknown issues but
> couldn't find the relevant one.
>
> Regards,
> Saurabh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lukas Tribus [mailto:lu...@gmx.net]
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 11:05 PM
> To: Saurabh Patwardhan; haproxy@formilux.org
> Cc: Manoj Mahadik; Tatiana Parshina
> Subject: Re: Question related to gpc0_rate values in stick-table
>
> [External Email]
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Am 25.09.2017 um 10:34 schrieb Saurabh Patwardhan:
>>
>> Hi HAProxy Team,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are using haproxy 1.5.2 as a load balancer for our solution.
>>
>
> Before going any further here, notice that 1.5.2 is 3 years old and has a
> huge amount of bugs:
> http://www.haproxy.org/bugs/bugs-1.5.2.html
>
> I strongly suggest you upgrade the code before diving into a full blown
> investigation, as very likely you hit at least one of the 199 known bugs in
> haproxy 1.5.2.
>
>
> Regards,
> Lukas
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or
> privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
> of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
> computer.
>
