On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:29:21PM +0100, Mateusz Malek wrote: > Hi, > > On 13.02.2018 15:27, Olivier Houchard wrote: > > Thanks a lot for the detailed analyze, and sorry for the late answer. > > You're probably right, SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL shouldn't be treated as an > > unrecoverable error. > > So, what you basically did was something equivalent to the patch attached ? > > Yeah, it looked exactly like this ;) I'm glad I could help.
So does this mean I should take the patch as is ? Please just let me know. Thanks, Willy
