On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 08:59:32PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > Ok, I am got respons from thread 3 and thread 7.
And never the other ones ? That's kind of strange! > Can I mean this threads mapped to CPU 3 and 7? No, this is totally unrelated, unless of course you're using cpu-map to map thread 1 to cpu 1, thread 2 to cpu 2 etc... > CPU 3 busy at 0.42, CPU 7 busy at 0.17, show activity is about same: > > thread_id: 3 > date_now: 1524245903.896442 > loops: 119914128 184812851 173923683 168285397 165260657 155576226 167823891 > 142903166 > wake_cache: 94411535 148233540 144512131 124600418 127222467 121950507 > 127136520 112878590 > wake_tasks: 58100 101310 22429 290349 154221 99918 207275 77221 > wake_applets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > wake_signal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > poll_exp: 94469635 148334850 144534560 124890767 127376688 122050425 > 127343795 112955811 > poll_drop: 1238561 1910768 636228 4940166 2745656 1892360 3545183 1547972 > poll_dead: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > poll_skip: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > fd_skip: 299688784 399135394 429530804 248537214 327557232 340203944 > 300964717 331714706 > fd_lock: 27928376 42948659 46096172 22460864 31946577 34536787 28610880 > 33200161 > fd_del: 6494887 10577819 3337682 37986875 16346727 10378443 23322889 8187644 > conn_dead: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > stream: 18389406 28258935 9395022 73963729 40378554 27746726 52452679 22637467 > empty_rq: 102497936 158696266 164717166 111903546 129615612 130001228 > 123814511 121700524 > long_rq: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > thread_id: 7 > date_now: 1524245909.919941 > loops: 119974591 184907272 174012444 168371911 165345936 155659245 167910558 > 142976547 > wake_cache: 94459348 148309188 144585673 124664378 127288213 122015537 > 127202211 112936359 > wake_tasks: 58123 101357 22438 290505 154304 99961 207379 77257 > wake_applets: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 > wake_signal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > poll_exp: 94517471 148410545 144608111 124954883 127442517 122115498 > 127409590 113013617 > poll_drop: 1239145 1911817 636564 4942753 2747081 1893376 3546921 1548730 > poll_dead: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > poll_skip: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > fd_skip: 299841823 399338153 429745993 248661716 327726077 340384467 > 301118348 331883440 > fd_lock: 27943327 42970960 46120113 22472636 31963565 34555176 28626056 > 33217139 > fd_del: 6497739 10583157 3339476 38006597 16354809 10383821 23334628 8191852 > conn_dead: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > stream: 18397654 28273212 9399987 74002315 40398851 27761908 52479235 22649415 > empty_rq: 102550508 158777515 164801058 111960753 129682899 130070277 > 123878819 121762731 > long_rq: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 So between these two the traffic is perfectly balanced. I don't see why you wouldn't have other threads :-/ Well, let's try something. In your global section you have a "stats socket ..." with a path. Please replicate this line to have 8 more of them, all with a different path (eg: /var/run/haproxy-stats becomes haproxy-stats1, -stats2 etc) and with a different thread binding using "process" like this : stats socket /var/run/haproxy-stats1 level admin process 1/1 stats socket /var/run/haproxy-stats2 level admin process 1/2 stats socket /var/run/haproxy-stats3 level admin process 1/3 ... stats socket /var/run/haproxy-stats8 level admin process 1/8 Then you can use the same command as above to dump exactly one thread's activity by connecting to each of these sockets. We definitely need to understand what the other threads are doing. Willy
