Hi Andrew, On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:08:11AM +0100, Andrew Smalley wrote: > Hi Willy > > Thank you for you for your detailed reply explaining why you think only the > favicon cache is sensible and that a full-blown cache within Haproxy > is not the best of ideas although interesting. > > I will continue the search for a viable yet small cache.
What are you looking for exactly ? What makes you think the small object cache would not be suited to your use case, or that it would be desirable to have a more complete cache inside the load balancer ? We didn't get much feedback on the cache, so your opinion on this is obviously interesting. Thanks, Willy
