Thanks, I didn't see that low value... however it's not that the problem, because that value is ignored in my case, since I don't use minconn: https://discourse.haproxy.org/t/backend-sessions-limit-200/1661 Basically fullconn is useful only if you set minconn (not my case), otherwise it is ignored.
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Jarno Huuskonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 11, Marco Colli wrote: > > > > > > Do you get better results if you'll use http instead of https ? > > > > > > I already tested it yesterday and the results are pretty much the same > > (only a very small improvement, which is expected, but not a substantial > > change). > > Couple of things to check: > - first: can you test serving the response straight from haproxy, > something like: > frontend www-frontend > ... > http-request deny deny_status 200 > > - second: from the stats screen captures you sent looks like > "backend www-backend" is limited to 500 sessions, try increasing > backend fullconn > (https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html#4.2- > fullconn) > > Are you running haproxy 1.6.3 ? It's pretty old (December 2015). > > -Jarno > > -- > Jarno Huuskonen >
