I just realized we have both referred to two different variants of the email, one with an s and one without:
submissi...@haproxy.com and submiss...@haproxy.com I sent mine to submiss...@haproxy.com (the first one you linked). Maybe you want to clarify for everyone which is the canonical before all the submissions end up accidentally hitting a junk drawer somewhere? :-) — Luke Seelenbinder Stadia Maps | Founder stadiamaps.com > On Jun 7, 2019, at 10:14, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 10:03:59AM +0200, Luke Seelenbinder wrote: >>> On another point, I was told that very few proposals for talks at the >>> HAProxyConf were sent to date. That doesn't surprize me and I haven't >>> even sent mine yet either :-) Please keep in mind that the deadline for >>> proposals submissions is in two weeks and that time flies. So instead of >>> wasting your time reading my lengthy boring e-mails, please take a few >>> minutes to scratch an idea of something that could be of interest to >>> others, such as "how we deal with logs at XXX", "how we keep our configs >>> in sync", "how we built our own CDN", "12 things to take care of for >>> scalability", "how we perform A/B testing", etc. Also if you contribute >>> to other OSS projects and see certain things done well there that you >>> think haproxy could benefit from, that could bring interesting discussions >>> as well! Anyway I'll ping again and more aggressively next week! >> >> >> Well, I guess now I *have* to submit that talk idea about how we built a >> global PoP network, saved 80-90% auth overhead per request, and saved money >> at the same time... :-) > > Oh yes definitely! > >> If we just use the form on the website, does that suffice or should we also >> submit to submissions@? > > I don't know :-) I simply sent an email to submissi...@haproxy.com > <mailto:submissi...@haproxy.com> with > my talk proposal (how to most efficiently contribute), I guess it will work > fine. > > Thanks, > Willy
