пн, 4 нояб. 2019 г. в 17:49, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>: > Hi Ilya, > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 12:18:49AM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote: > > hello, > > > > should we switch some builds to arm64? > > > > https://blog.travis-ci.com/2019-10-07-multi-cpu-architecture-support > > Ah that's interesting! I frequently build for arm/arm64 but I agree > it would be nice to have this done more frequently. The two main points > I'm seeing are : > - unsigned chars, which occasionally trigger a warning somewhere > - non-x86 build, which can occasionally trigger a build error if > we accidently rely on an arch-specific function > > In fact I would even suggest that we build for arm instead of arm64 so > that we switch to 32 bits at the same time and have an opportunity to > detect long vs int vs uint64t vs pointer vs size_t issues (typically > places where printf uses "%lu" without a cast for uint64_t). >
only arm64 are available. we can try arm using cross build, for example. is it common way to use cross build for building haproxy ? > > Thanks, > Willy >
