чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 15:18, William Dauchy <w.dau...@criteo.com>:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:09:30PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > I understand. However, those patches add complexity (which might be moved > > to another dedicated tool) > > those patch makes sense for heavy haproxy instances. As you might have > seen above, we are talking about > 130MB of data. So for a full scraping > every 60s or less, this is not realistic. Even the data loading might > take too much time. We had cases where loading the data on exporter side > was taking more time than the frequency of scraping, generating a > snowball effect. > It's a good pratice to avoid exporting data you know > you won't use instead of: scraping -> deleting -> aggregate > In our case we do not use most of the server metrics. It represents a > factor of 10 in terms of exported data. > yep. I did see 130mb and I was impressed. > > -- > William >
