вс, 19 янв. 2020 г. в 13:13, Martin Grigorov <martin.grigo...@gmail.com>:
> Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 22:10 Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> tests on ARM64 randomly fail >> https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/277236120 >> >> (after restart there's a good chance to success) >> > > I have the same observation on TravisCI. I think the reason is that their > arm64 instances are less powerful than the amd64 ones. > At https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures it is said: > While available to all Open Source repositories, the concurrency available > for multiple CPU arch-based jobs is limited during the alpha period. > Not sure how much limited it is though. > I'd like to investigate that on dedicated ARM64 server (which I currently does not have). I applied for one at Linode, no answer yet. also, it might depend on number of CPU (race condition likely reproduce on many CPU than on single CPU server). also, arm64 seems not very happy about our linker options /usr/bin/ld: src/ev_poll.o(.debug_info+0x78): R_AARCH64_ABS64 used with TLS symbol poll_events > > Today this test failed once on my VM: > > # top TEST reg-tests/seamless-reload/abns_socket.vtc FAILED (1.111) > exit=2 > 1 tests failed, 0 tests skipped, 34 tests passed > ########################## Gathering results ########################## > ###### Test case: reg-tests/seamless-reload/abns_socket.vtc ###### > ## test results in: > "/tmp/haregtests-2020-01-19_08-06-39.45Hchw/vtc.8496.328d7f95" > ---- c1 HTTP rx failed (fd:6 read: Connection reset by peer) > Makefile:964: recipe for target 'reg-tests' failed > make: *** [reg-tests] Error 1 > > but the next 4 runs were successul. > > >> сб, 18 янв. 2020 г. в 09:52, Martin Grigorov <martin.grigo...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:17 PM Martin Grigorov < >>> martin.grigo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020, 23:12 William Lallemand <wlallem...@haproxy.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>>>> > Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123 >>>>> >>>>> This binary was built with code from 1 week ago, it's normal that the >>>>> test does >>>>> not work since the fix was made this week. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'm using the same steps to build HAProxy as from .travis-ci.yml >>>> I guess I have to add "make clean" in the beginning. >>>> I'll try it tomorrow! Thanks! >>>> >>> >>> That was it! >>> Everything is back to normal now! >>> Thank you, William! >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> William Lallemand >>>>> >>>>
