We are running this patch on top of 1.9.13 where it is needed. I will report back if/when we have anything to add. Untill then consider no news as good news in regards to this.
Dave. On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:37 AM Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:31:07AM -0600, Dave Chiluk wrote: > > Can we get this backported onto the 2.0 and 1.9 stable streams? It > > looks like it mostly cleanly patches. *(aside from line numbers). > > Given that the risk of regression is far from zero (hence the tag "medium"), > I'd rather avoid for a while and observe instead. Very few users will notice > an improvement, maybe only two, but every Lua user would have to accept the > risk of a possible regression, so care is mandatory. We'd do it to 2.1 first, > and after a few releases possibly to 2.0 if there is compelling demand for > this. By then 1.9 will likely be dead anyway. > > If you're facing a high enough Lua-based connection rate that would make this > a nice improvement to the point where you'd be taking the risk to use the > backport, I think everyone would very much appreciate that you run with this > patch for a while to help confirm it doesn't break anything. > > Thanks, > Willy