We are running this patch on top of 1.9.13 where it is needed. I will
report back if/when we have anything to add.  Untill then consider no
news as good news in regards to this.

Dave.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:37 AM Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:31:07AM -0600, Dave Chiluk wrote:
> > Can we get this backported onto the 2.0 and 1.9 stable streams?  It
> > looks like it mostly cleanly patches. *(aside from line numbers).
>
> Given that the risk of regression is far from zero (hence the tag "medium"),
> I'd rather avoid for a while and observe instead. Very few users will notice
> an improvement, maybe only two, but every Lua user would have to accept the
> risk of a possible regression, so care is mandatory. We'd do it to 2.1 first,
> and after a few releases possibly to 2.0 if there is compelling demand for
> this. By then 1.9 will likely be dead anyway.
>
> If you're facing a high enough Lua-based connection rate that would make this
> a nice improvement to the point where you'd be taking the risk to use the
> backport, I think everyone would very much appreciate that you run with this
> patch for a while to help confirm it doesn't break anything.
>
> Thanks,
> Willy

Reply via email to