Willy,

Am 24.01.20 um 15:11 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Well, I guess this is reasonable. I'm still just not 100% sold to the
> syntax yet, so depending on users feedback I don't exclude changing it
> again, in which case we'll have to backport it as well so that 2.1->2.2
> remains a smooth upgrade. It shouldn't be a big deal as users running
> such non-LTS versions cannot have outdated versions anyway (or they're
> trying hard to run into trouble), and know they may face a bit more
> rough edges than with LTS ones.
> 

I can work with adjusting my configuration, if necessary. Compiling my
own HAProxy comes with a little more effort.

So that's entirely fine for me.

Thanks
Tim Düsterhus

Reply via email to