Sure, go ahead. Op vr 15 mei 2020 om 20:24 schreef Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com>:
> I mean, I will include your fix into next spellcheck patch if you do not > mind > > On Fri, May 15, 2020, 11:22 PM Olaf Buitelaar <olaf.buitel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Илья Шипицин, >> >> The codespell looks really cool. But i'm sorry, I cannot really find how >> i can add a check for this case, otherwise i would be happy to add it. >> >> Best Olaf >> >> Op vr 15 mei 2020 om 16:21 schreef Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com>: >> >>> that's a typo. >>> >>> >>> we established weekly "codespell" check >>> here's example of check: >>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/runs/665274281?check_suite_focus=true >>> >>> I submit spell fixes from time to time, I may include your fix as well >>> if you do not mind >>> (it was impossible to catch "an" <--> "and" from spellcheck point of >>> view, both are valid words) >>> >>> чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 16:48, Olaf Buitelaar <olaf.buitel...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Dear HaProxy folks, >>>> >>>> I'm not sure but i think there is a "d" missing in this line on the >>>> performance section of the homepage; >>>> optimized *HTTP header analysis* : headers are parsed an interpreted >>>> on the fly, >>>> i think it should be; >>>> optimized *HTTP header analysis* : headers are parsed an*d* >>>> interpreted on the fly, >>>> Sorry for nitpicking..or if i'm wrong. >>>> >>>> Best Olaf >>>> >>>
