Hi Takeshi, On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:21:59AM +0000, mizuta.take...@fujitsu.com wrote: > Dear maintainers, > > Thank you for discussing issue#670 on github. > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/670 > > I have attached a patch that resolves the issue. > (I have changed the config keyword from the commit on github.) > Would you please comment on the patch?
Thank you for this. We've been very busy these last weeks, chasing a bunch of bugs that have postponed the 2.2 release, which is why I couldn't spend more time discussing with you on this. I'd initially have preferred different names but actually your point about the values used in /proc is at least partially valid. I'm saying "partially" because if others made a mistake by naming their variables we're not forced to copy them :-) But I mean, that's probably OK and I won't argue on this. I'd be interested in others' opinions and/or suggestions on this, but it's not critical. > Documentation and test code will be added in the near future. Thanks. > This is the first time I have posted to this community, so feel free to say > anything. The welcome, and well done for your first post, it's not every day that the first one is that good! > - Documentation should be provided at the same time. Yes please, in the same commit so that any eventual backport that may happen isn't lost! > - Patch should be split. No I don't think anything needs to be split further, it's quite self-contained. Please just add "tcp:" as a subsystem tag. This helps when grepping for various stuff in the history. I think you can tag it MINOR as the impact is extremely low and I don't think I would have much objections against a backport to recent branches after some time cooking in -dev if someone really needs it. Thank you! Willy
