Very interesting. Anyway, I can see that this pice of code was refactored some time ago: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/f96508aae6b49277dcf142caa35042678cf8e2ca <https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/f96508aae6b49277dcf142caa35042678cf8e2ca>
Maybe it is worth to try 2.2 or 2.3 branch? Yes, it is a blind shot and just a guess. -- wbr, Kirill > On 25. Sep 2020, at 16:01, Maciej Zdeb <mac...@zdeb.pl> wrote: > > Yes at the same place with same value: > > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x0000559ce98b964b in h2s_notify_recv (h2s=0x559cef94e7e0) at > src/mux_h2.c:783 > sw = 0xffffffff > > > > pt., 25 wrz 2020 o 15:42 Kirill A. Korinsky <kir...@korins.ky > <mailto:kir...@korins.ky>> napisał(a): > > On 25. Sep 2020, at 15:26, Maciej Zdeb <mac...@zdeb.pl > > <mailto:mac...@zdeb.pl>> wrote: > > > > I was mailing outside the list with Willy and Christopher but it's worth > > sharing that the problem occurs even with nbthread = 1. I've managed to > > confirm it today. > > > I'm curious is it crashed at the same place with the same value? > > -- > wbr, Kirill > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
