Le 08/04/2021 à 20:59, Tim Duesterhus a écrit :
Willy,
Christopher,

Not sure who of you is better suited to review this series, so I'm adding both
of you :-)

I'm tagging this as RFC, because it's large and quite a bit outside of my
comfort zone. However the patches are as clean as possible. They include full
documentation and each normalizer comes with a bunch of reg-tests ensuring they
behave like I expect them to behave. So if you have nothing to complain, then
this series is in a mergeable state. I plan to add a few more normalizers after
this passes an initial review.

I'll add additional remarks to each patch, explaining my decisions in more
detail.


Thanks Tim, I'll try to review your patches next week.


--
Christopher Faulet

Reply via email to