On 01.06.21 14:23, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Aleks,
On 6/1/21 10:30 AM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
This phrasing is understandable to me, but now I'm wondering if this is the
best solution. Maybe the already existing user-configurable unique request ID
should instead be sent to the SPOE and then logged?
https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/2.2/configuration.html#7.3.6-unique-id
The request_counter (%rt) you mentioned could be embedded into this unique-id.
Well this uniqe-id is not send as Stream ID to SPOA receiver, due to this fact
can't you debug which stream is the troubled one.
Yes, that's why I suggested that the SPOE is extended to also include this
specific ID somewhere (just) for logging purposes.
Yep.
Any opinion from the other community Members?
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
