Tim, On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 06:06:55PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote: > It is not useful to start a configuration where an invalid static string is > provided as the JWT algorithm. Better make the administrator aware of the > suspected typo by failing to start.
I'm hopeful that I can finally emit dev12 this evening as we think we've just nailed down the resolvers bugs. I'll wait for Rémi's ack for these ones as I'm really clueless about that are for now, but that will likely get merged in next one as that seems to look fine at first glance. Regarding the question about "unlikely()" for the 2nd patch, it wouldn't change anything given that most of the cost is already spent in the comparisons, the assignment is totally benign. Thanks, Willy
