Hi Willy.
On 07.01.23 19:49, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 06:31:40PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
On 07.01.23 10:38, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi,
HAProxy 2.8-dev1 was released on 2023/01/07. It added 206 new commits
after version 2.8-dev0.
[snipp]
Any chance to add this patch to 1.8?
[PATCH] MINOR: sample: Add bc_rtt and bc_rttvar
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg42962.html
What's the plan for this feature request?
We can merge it. I think the reason it's been let rotting is that it
seems from its commit message to be quite strongly tied to the EWMA
stuff and in my opinion it should not. As you mentioned in the message
above, it has plenty of use cases, one of which is simply logging. Some
may want it to be backported just for logging and we don't want to put
such confusing references there. So let's just adjust the commit message
to be more factual about what it does (i.e. provide bc_rtt and bc_rtt_avg
to report the RTT measured over a TCP backend connection) and be done
with it.
That's a good point. Have send the patch without the EWMA commit message
in the original mail thread .
Server weight modulation based on smoothed average measurement
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/1977
which looks a per-requirement for
New Balancing algorithm (Peak) EWMA
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/1570
I really have no status for all this. Feature requests accumulate facter
than bug reports and the only cases where I create one is to make sure
to dump what I have in mind after a discussion so that I have somewhere
to look for the details when trying to get back to it :-/
Okay, thanks for the explanation.
Cheers,
Willy
Regards
Alex
