> On 18.03.2023., at 20:01, Aleksandar Lazic <al-hapr...@none.at> wrote:
> 
> 

[…]

> ```
> My choice not to do TCP in musl's stub resolver was based on an 
> interpretation that truncated results are not just acceptable but better ux - 
> not only do you save major round-trip delays to DNS but you also get a 
> reasonable upper bound on # of addrs in result.
> 
>    -Rich Felker (via twitter)
> ```
> 
> Any chance to get also a libc based image with quic?
> 

[…]

Hi Alex,

Certainly, that’s not a problem at all and I will look into it early this week 
and decide to do Debian or Ubuntu first depending on existing Docker Hub 
statistics for the popularity of haproxytech images.


Kind regards,
D.

-- 
Dinko Korunic                   ** Standard disclaimer applies **
Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha

Reply via email to