---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Anthony Doeraene <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] FEATURE: add MPTCP per address support
To: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>


> Otherwise let me know if I can apply it as-is.

Seems good to me ! Thank you again for your reviews.

> I'm very happy that after so long this topic has been alive, with your,
> Matt's and Dorian's help we're finally reaching the end of the tunnel!

Thank you also for being open to these changes ! The fact that haproxy
should support soon MPTCP could encourage even more application
developers to use it, as it becomes easier for them to enable it on the
server side :D. For the anecdote, we had a debate with some application
developers that lacked support for MPTCP in haproxy just 3 days ago, that
should help them too !

Have a nice day,
Doeraene Anthony

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 3:25 PM Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 11:50:27AM +0200, Aperence wrote:
> > diff --git a/src/backend.c b/src/backend.c
> > index 6956d9bfe..e4bd465e9 100644
> > --- a/src/backend.c
> > +++ b/src/backend.c
> > @@ -1690,8 +1690,9 @@ int connect_server(struct stream *s)
> >
> >       if (!srv_conn->xprt) {
> >               /* set the correct protocol on the output stream connector */
> > +
> >               if (srv) {
> > -                     if (conn_prepare(srv_conn, 
> > protocol_lookup(srv_conn->dst->ss_family, PROTO_TYPE_STREAM, 0), 
> > srv->xprt)) {
> > +                     if (conn_prepare(srv_conn, 
> > protocol_lookup(srv_conn->dst->ss_family, PROTO_TYPE_STREAM, 
> > srv->alt_proto), srv->xprt)) {
> >                               conn_free(srv_conn);
> >                               return SF_ERR_INTERNAL;
> >                       }
>
> This one could have been left in a separate patch (like the 3/4) but as
> we know that no other backend proto uses alt_proto right now, it really
> has no impact.
>
> Nothing else to say for the rest of the series. It's clean and looks
> sane. I'm ready to merge it. I'd just adjust the severity subject tags
> (MINOR for the first 2 and MEDIUM for the last two I think), and change
> one word in the previous patch's commit message as mentioned.
>
> If you have any last-minute change pending, feel free to suggest them
> (I can apply them manually if they're trivial) or to resend the series.
> Otherwise let me know if I can apply it as-is.
>
> I'm very happy that after so long this topic has been alive, with your,
> Matt's and Dorian's help we're finally reaching the end of the tunnel!
>
> Thanks!
> Willy


Reply via email to