Hello Steven, On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 07:01:06PM +0000, Collison, Steven wrote: > Hi William, > > > I find it confusing in the TLS context where everything is named either an > > algorithm or a signature. group seems to be a common name for that, > > wouldn't it > > be better to use it? Maybe something like PP2_SUBTYPE_SSL_GROUP ? > > I am aligned with that as "group" is used in TLS library APIs for > accessing key exchange and is also used in the TLS IANA registry. > > > What's the difference between PP2_SUBTYPE_SSL_SIG_SCHEME and > > PP2_SUBTYPE_SSL_SIG_SCHEME_ALG ? > > Ah, this was a mistype. They are meant to be the same. Per your > previous suggestion, I think PP2_SUBTYPE_SSL_SIG_SCHEME makes sense. I > can go ahead and start on a patch for PP2_SUBTYPE_SSL_GROUP and > PP2_SUBTYPE_SSL_SIG_SCHEME unless you see any other blockers to > discuss.
That seems great thank you! -- William Lallemand
