On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 11:05:11AM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Subject: Re: Some questions about ACME challenge dns-01 > > > > Seems like a bug to me, since there are 2 domains it generated 2 > > > > challenges to > > > > set but your wildcard has the same base as the 2nd domain so there's a > > > > problem. I'll take a look. > > > > > > > > The task seems stuck waiting for every challenge_ready. I think I'll > > > > add more > > > > states in the `acme status` command so we can debug this more easily. > > >
I just pushed a fix in master, you will have to set the 2 TXT entries with the same domain name like explained in the logs. But using `acme challenge_ready` will set every domain with the same name ready. Unfortunately the 3.2 release was already pushed so this will be backported for the next one. > > > Thank you. > > > Maybe some `trace acme ...???` can help here? > > > > That won't help because it's not the traffic, it's just waiting for all > > challenge_ready commands. > > But traces are already available with -dt acme:developer:complete if you > > need them. > > Thank you. > > > > I will wait for your patches to test the ACME DNS setup to make it > > > production reday :-) > > > > > > Should I create an Issue for that or do you want to keept the work on the > > > ML? > > > > I don't think a ticket is needed, unless you really want one. I'm already > > working on it. > > Great. Just for your info here the trace output. > Be careful when sharng traces like that, there's crypto details about your ACME account that you probably don't want to share. -- William Lallemand
