uhttpd seems good to me. Brgds, Viktor On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas <dbto...@dbtopas.lt>wrote:
> Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote: > >> Ok, I'll do, if Mindaugas agree. Do you have a name proposal ? >> I think we can name it webserver (what fantasy ;-) ). >> One version I have is based on Mindaugas version with socket.c and it is >> fast and stable. Another is based on inet*() version, that offers actually >> multiplatform support and extensions, but it has some problems. >> So if it is ok I will upload first version. >> Both have one problem at end of application if using HRBs modules >> (Unrecoverable 9001 error) but only on exit and I have not found the cause, >> otherwise they works. >> > > Feel free to do anything with proposed uhttpd (also commit). I just have > some ideas how to extend it, but I'm not sure if these ideas will be similar > to SVN changes by other people. It can happen, that after some time I will > propose something completely different and incompatible from SVN. > > I do not remember if I've mentioned the initial idea of name "uhttpd". Here > "u" stands for "micro", since the first version was a tiny 300 prg lines > http server. > > > Best regards, > Mindaugas > > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
