Hi Francesco,
> What do you think of making uhttpd a library? This way it could easily be >> embedded in other apps. >> This would need some generalizations here and there, plus detaching the >> UI. This way it could become an hbhttpd.lib, launchable from any apps using >> one function call, and probably some hooks to get feedback on what's going >> on. >> >> What I'm need now is to have a complete web server (with SSL support, > sessions support, database sharing helper functions, cache support (?), ...) > and multiplatform (removing actual embedded WIN_* API calls or better moving > them into harbour core making them multiplatform, like SETENV or > SYSREFRESH). > After, or in the middle, we can think to move all inside a single function > call and move it in a library so can be embedded, that is not so difficult > (I will try, but it has a lower priority than finish web server). > Another thing is to create a final version of cgi lib to use with web > server and integrate it to uhttpd (actually I have a mine minicgi.lib that > I'm using and with I have built testcgi.exe) as definitive version to use in > harbour (now there are 2 or 3 around). > Tell me if it is ok as path. Looks perfect to me. We should also tidy up the source from xhb.lib and hbcompat.ch dependent parts, but it's just a few places. Proper CGI lib would be nice, we have one in hbtip, how's that one? > Do you have tested also testcgi.exe as I wrote in Changelog ? Yes, and it's working fine, too. Brgds, Viktor
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
