I'd suggest to remove bcc16.cf. [ I wasn't expecting it to work either. ] What do you think?
Brgds, Viktor On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <dru...@acn.waw.pl>wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: > > Hi, > > > Worked here with Mingw and msys. > > I've just tested BCC16, and got this: > > --- > > echo. ../../../../lib/dos/bcc16/hbcommon.lib &> __lib__.tmp > > The syntax of the command is incorrect. > > --- > > [ plus, 'install' mode doesn't work at all. ] > > [ well, BCC16 is really just a portability exercise, isn't it :) ] > > Thanks for tests. > Looks that it works with *nixes and MS-Windows MSYS. > There are problems with DOS builds. I made some tests with > DOS (in DOSEMU) and DJGPP and it does not work. Looks like > a problems with recursive calls and -C flag. It stops to > work on second level. I'll try to make deeper tests tomorrow. > I would like to ask someone to make MinGW or other Win32 build > tests but without MSYS to check if it works. And if possible > OS2 build tests. For platforms which will not work I'll restore > previous version. For other ones I'd prefer to keep new version > which better utilize parallel processing. It greatly reduces the > compilation time. > > I've never tried to make BCC16 builds so I cannot say it was > ever working. And I'm talking only about make process. For sure > current HVM/RTL cannot work in 16bit environment due to memory > limitations. > > best regards, > Przemek > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
