On Wednesday 18 February 2009 21:09:59 Viktor Szakáts wrote: > Hi all, > After rechecking the situation with gtcrs, gtsln, > I'd like to ask group whether we could move > these two GTs to the contrib area. > > The reasons are: > 1) Dependency on optional external libs, > with the same issues our contribs have to deal with, > but managed by other means, special > switches and envvars all deepely embedded > into the make system. Most of this could > be easily standardized if these would be > simple contribs.
There is not reason to do that, these GT's are part of the *nix builds. > > 2) Both seems to be superseded by gttrm. gttrm, gtcrs, gtsln are independent on each other, so there is none similarity between them. > > [ We can also apply the methods used for > contribs in their current location, and I plan > to do this to clean these obscure parts of > the make system. hbmk would also IMO the scripts are ok. > integrate much better if these two wouldn't > be such exceptions as they currently are. ] > > What do you think? best regards, Teo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
