Hi Przemek, I just want to signal a building problem with 'CentOS 5.3' based on 'RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.3'. Just to clarify the stability of the distribution. The RHEL is upgraded from 5.3 to 5.4 just in the last weeks. Yes, the 'sqlite' is quite "old", but is furnished by the RHEL 5.3 too. As I see our common goal is to maintain the compatibility at least with these stable releases too.
Best regards, István -----Original Message----- From: Przemyslaw Czerpak [mailto:dru...@acn.waw.pl] Sent: 2009. szeptember 9. 19:53 To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: RE: [Harbour] 'sqlite3' is skipped in clean phase, but isn't skipped in install phase. On Wed, 09 Sep 2009, Bisz István wrote: Hi, > sqlite.i386 3.3.6-2 > installed > sqlite-devel.i386 3.3.6-2 > installed It's quite old version. If you have a while please try to update hbsqlit3.c code to work with you SQLITE3 version, i.e. at line 441 we have: if( pHbSqlite3 && pHbSqlite3->db ) { hb_retni( sqlite3_extended_result_codes(pHbSqlite3->db, hb_parl(2)) ); } change it to: if( pHbSqlite3 && pHbSqlite3->db ) { /* TODO: verify exact SQLITE3 version in * which sqlite3_extended_result_codes() was added */ #if SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER > 3003006 hb_retni( sqlite3_extended_result_codes(pHbSqlite3->db, hb_parl(2)) ); #else hb_retni( -1 ); #endif } 3003006 is you SQLITE3. You can try to invest more time and check exact SQLITE3 version in which some functions appeared, i.e. if functions was intorduce im 3.4.0 then cahnge #if condition to: #if SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER >= 3004000 otherwise use > instead of >= and leave TODO: note so other developers will know that the exact SQLITE3 version was not precisely defined and can update it in the future. If you send to us your modifications then we can commit them to SVN or if you want then we can give you an account so you can make it yourself. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
