>> Nobody seems to be interested, or waits for others to fix it. >> Someone will have to actually look into it. >> >> Sad. How is that possible that nobody uses it? Is there an alternative? >> I'd love to look into it, but my knowledge in C & Harbour internals is >> less then zero!
I haven't said nobody uses is, but seemingly nobody who'd need it is willing to put any effort into it. >> Why would you (or Przemek or any of you good quys) not look into? (just >> begging please do.) I mean why is this bug less of a bug then any other? I'm not interested in it. I'm not getting paid for this, and I rarely see even a 'thank you', so I'm working on what I'm interested in. Current .dll implementation is an ugly one (with ASM), and nobody even commented on my win64 stuff, so I assume we don't have any experts interested in this enough to contribute. The technical alternative is to write a Harbour C wrapper for the functions you need from other .dlls. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
