Hi Roberto I agree we need gui today and in long term web why a common class like xbase++ part (XHB also without hb extension) can't be a solution? Today this class is wrapped to hbQT and Tomorrow to gtk,minigui or fivewin we also implement a set syntax to that can reference this class instead of internal gui replacement syntax of gui This idea came from vianemo project not jet started
2010/1/27 Roberto Lopez <rober...@gmail.com>: > Angel Pais wrote: > 1. Basic core GUI classes must be defined as 'Harbour own' classes, then, do > wrappers to connect it to the GUI framework selected to do this development. > Expose to users (Harbour programemrs) the QT, GTK (or whatever) API should > be not a solution. >> 3. In the case that it be possible, the extension of these features to give > to current and future Harbour users, some kind of native support to create > web-enabled applications, should be considered. > > > Roberto. > _______________________________________________ > -- Massimo Belgrano _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
