>> Could possibly be. I don't use hbsms at all, don't even >> have a serial cable around to test it, so I hope it will >> be "community" fixed eventually. I meant it as an >> initiative in the first place. > > Not could but for sure is. > >> The last .prg I've just sent to the list has all these >> undone, yet it doesn't work for some reason. > > Please read my message again. > The bug inside tp_send() is still in the code you sent. > The condition in DO WHILE in line 322 is always FALSE > when timeout is 0. > >> I'd appreciate if you could make what you think is needed. > > I already gave you precise answers about the existing bug > intorduce by recent seconds()=>hb_milliSeconds() modifications > and the potential problems inside hbsms which may cause random > bug reports to this list. > It's enough you carefully read what I wrote :-)
Sorry but I'm not interested in fixing these components, as I don't use them and can't test them. I read your message and appreciate you input, but I want to avoid spending days until everything works out fine at the end. IOW I want this monkey off my back. If it helps I just delete hbsms from SVN. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
