Chuck, Please always report your logs with exact carrier frequencies, as closely as you can measure them, which appears to be to two decimal places. Side tune if you like or need to but give us the real frequency.
Reporting a frequency as ``where it sounds best`` leads to inaccuracies, and inability to compare one report with another. That would be like in a less DXy situation, reporting some 6185 station as ``6187`` because it sounds clearer there when tuned on some receiver, or because of QRM on one side. The exact carrier frequency is an essential atttribute of any transmission. Now we can only wonder if many of your previous items were not exact carrier freaquencies. 73, Glenn Hauser --- On Sat, 4/11/09, ka4...@peoplepc.com <ka4...@peoplepc.com> wrote: > Peru, 6195.77, Radio Cusco, 2345-0010, Noted a couple of > males and > a female all conversing together. At 0006 the freq is > starting to get noisy > while the signal hasn't improved anymore. The actual > freq for this station > is 6195.813 measured by Brandon Jordan, in Tenn. I am > listening where > I can hear the details the best for my hearing. At 0008 > music presented. > Signal remained from threshold to poor during this period. > (Chuck Bolland, > April 12, 2009) > > Clewiston, Florida > WJ HF1000 > > http://www.orchidcitysoftware.com/IMAGE59.HTML > > UPDATED MAGNA ---[Start Commercial]--------------------- Order your WRTH 2009: http://www.hard-core-dx.com/redirect2.php?id=wrth2009 ---[End Commercial]----------------------- ________________________________________ Hard-Core-DX mailing list Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ _______________________________________________ THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License published by Michael Stutz at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
