On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:

May I suggest shifting the frame of reference to the global context
which is where open source really matters. In this context the numbers
of potential adopters for VistA, whether for clinics or hospitals
becomes staggering. Not one of any of the current vendors of any system
has the capacity or business model to ramp up the way a well designed
open source application with an effective community behind it can.

If VistA is documented to show its conformance with common conventions for conceptual content and functions and the process by which it will evolve both conceptually and technically by Life Cycle Principles that VistA vendors can support, it will be attractive to the market. The framework must be general so that the educational system (formal and continuing) can explain the entire framework to the end users. That is not presently the case but it is achievable; figure out how to tell the story and the VistA community will thrive.


> VistA is a classic example of a disruptive technology...stay tuned we
are just at the beginning of the ride.

Joseph is correct the opportunity is wide open to those with discipline and hard work. We'll be most interested as to how the upcoming meeting fromaulates the story.



Joseph




On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 17:03, Michael Ginsburg wrote:
Bill,

Let's not confuse ourselves. As far as I know, there are no commercial
vendors planning to release their products as Open Source or to put
them in the public domain. If I'm wrong, please let us know! If I'm
right, than the VistA community, regardless of the actual number, is
larger than a non-existent (fill in the blank) community. So worrying
about something that doesn't exist isn't going to help us.

Having said that, the size of the VistA community will be important as
we move forward. It's the law of Small Numbers. 1% market penetration
is 4000! That's a lot of potential customers for any business. These
are customers that will need help implementing their systems, training
their users and fixing problems when they arise. They will also be
constantly demanding upgrades and improvements. Figuring out how to
provide all that to the same standard set by the best non-VistA
vendors is the challenge for the VistA community. And I say community
because references and credibility are the keys to product acceptance.
If a VistA site crashes and burns it will reflect badly and impede the
efforts of everyone.  You are right, the community needs to get
serious.

As for documentation, I can assure you that VistA-Office EHR will be a
high quality product in all respects, including good documentation. As
for M, I see that as being a big plus since it's the only technology
that I know of that is purpose-built to handle medical information.

But that's just my opinion.

Mike

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/15/2004 4:17:15 PM >>>

Hi Michael, ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Ginsburg To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 1:18 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Fwd: Text of Article from Modern Physician

        In my opinion, (and, as always, I speak only for myself) I
        would agree that in a head to head competition with "Open
        Logician" that VistA-Office EHR would lose. That is if all you
        were comparing was functionality. As a system for the
        physician's office, Logician is a more mature offering, no
        question. VistA-Office EHR is only in the embryonic stage.
        However, if you were to compare them in "open source"
        market and all that implies and entails, VistA-Office EHR
        would be the clear winner. To the best of my knowledge,
        Logician does not have a rabid (and I mean that only in the
        nicest sense!), international community of developers or an
        organized community of cooperating vendors who can supply
        professional services, with all working in concert to promote,
        support and enhance the application.

        This community you speak of...  how big is it exactly?
        Compared to the one the exists that could and would sign up to
        support Open Logician.  See my comments re: this topic in my
        response to Mark.

        On the topic of 'rabid' ... I've never seen that included in a
        recommended list of selection criteria.  Reliable,
        yes.  References, yes.  Responsive, yes.  Cost effective, yes.

        Frankly, I'm not sure that VistA has all that yet either and
        therein lies the challenge and the opportunity!  Yes, the
        serious discussions have to start, but, the VistA community
        doesn't need a survival strategy, it needs a growth strategy.

        We don't disagree on this.  It's perspective, I guess.  Growth
        vs. Survival.  My background in business has perhaps
        conditioned me to see that not as a choice, but as an
        imperative.  Grow or die.  That's the law of the market.

        This will be big. There are roughly 400,000 physicians in the
        US. If we achieve 1% market penetration...

        Your definition of "big" is underwhelming.  If 1% is your
        honest assessment of VistA Office's real market potential, I'd
        strongly suggest you keep it to yourself when talking to
        vendors like HP.  In fact, I'd strongly suggest you begin
        working on a statement to "spin" that in case they've already
        heard you.  "What I really meant..."

        Even it that's a good number though, the current VistA
        community couldn't support it unless you think Docs will just
        line up and wait.  They might.  I doubt it.

        What's needed is a serious discussion to address the two core
        issues.
        1) Documentation - it's got to be there.  No option.
        2) M - it's got to be a non-issue.  Best option here may be to
        wrap VistA in a SOAP bubble and treat it as a web service.
        GUI front-ends need to be built for both clinician and sys
        admin use.

        Get these issues resolved and VistA has a real chance.

        But if all you're shooting for is 1%...

        Back in the early '90's I learned an important lesson.  It's
        easier to get $5 million from a VC than it is $500K.  The
        reason is that they have to invest just as much time and
        effort into making the business successful either way.  The
        only thing that's different is the size of the potential
        reward.

        Personally, I think the potential here is much larger than
        1%.  But it all depends on the community getting serious.  I
        am.

        Best regards,
        Bill




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members

Reply via email to